05 March, 2006

Week 3 Essay...

Solicitation and Conspiracy
The differences

Evan E. Kerr
CJ 105 Criminal Law
1135 Tuesday - Thursday

Conspiracy and solicitation are both inchoate crimes. The crimes have differences in actions and punishments that vary in statutes from state to state. To see the differences you have to look at the definitions to start and then the statutes that apply to the crime. The Missouri Revised Statutes does show differences between conspiracy and solicitation.

In the textbook Criminal Law Eighth Edition the definition of conspiracy is the crime of agreeing to commit a crime, the statute in the Missouri Revised Statutes reads as:

· A person is guilty of conspiracy with another person or persons to commit an offense if, with the purpose of promoting or facilitating its commission he agrees with such other person or persons that they or one or more of them will engage in conduct which constitutes such offense. 564.016 RSMo

The statute also goes on to explain the elements that are required for this offense and what is required for conviction. The major requirement for a conviction on the charge of conspiracy is that an overt act in the conspiracy must occur. The conspiracy statute recommends what the punishments are based on the level of conspiracy (dependent upon the type of crime being conspired) is.

Solicitation is the crime of getting someone else to do a crime for you according to Criminal Law Eighth Edition. The Missouri Revised Statutes has no real statute against solicitation, according to an article in the May June 2000 addition of the Missouri Bar Journal, Criminal Attempt law In Missouri: Death of a Tale of Two Theories by H. Morely Swingle, Mr. Swingle writes this about solicitation:

· …Solicitation amounting to a substantial step can constitute an attempt in Missouri. {State v. Malasky, 765 S.W.2d 597, 601-602 (Mo. Banc 1989)} The Comment to the Criminal code points out that soliciting an agent to engage in conduct constituting an element of the offense amounts to a substantial step “if strongly indicative of the actors criminal purpose” {Section 564.011, V.A.M.S. Comment to 1973 Proposed code.}

The crime of solicitation in Missouri becomes an attempt and is dependant upon the statute of attempt to prove the case through a “substantial step” of hiring or urging an agent to do a crime for the actor. Punishment of this crime is dependant upon the level of the crime the solicitor wants done and is actually less severe than the punishment of the actual crime.

Solicitation differs from conspiracy in Missouri Revised Statutes as it is considered an Attempt.

Sources:

1. Criminal Law Eighth Edition
By Joel Samaha
Copyright 2005 Wadsworth of Thomson Learning Inc
Library of Congress Control Number: 20041044326
Student ISBN: 0-534-62991-1

2. Criminal Attempt Law In Missouri: Death of a Tale of Two Theories
By H. Morely Swingle
Journal of the Missouri Bar
Volume 56 – No. 3 May June 2000
As posted at:
http://www.mobar.org/journal/2000/mayjun/swingle.htm

3. Missouri Revised Statutes
Title XXXVIII
Chapter 564 Inchoate Crimes
Sections 564.011 Attempt and 564.016 Conspiracy
As posted at:
http://www.moga.state.mo.us/statutes/chapters/chap564.htm

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home